QuarkXPress Articles
Note: Clicking on an article will take you away from this site and to the article on the publishing magazine or Website.
Whether Quark regains the status of serious InDesign competitor or simply becomes to InDesign what PageMaker was to XPress–an aging but occassionally useful second stringer–will depend largely on what 6.5 holds. The half-step version needs to prove Quark’s commitment to the customer and what his work is about. The market needs from Quark a show of good faith.
Press Release
DENVER—July 27, 2004—Quark announced today its membership in Networked Graphic Production (NGP), an initiative of leading print industry vendors committed to working together to deliver seamlessly integrated solutions that maximise the efficiency and profitability of its joint customers…
Would I like to see competition remain in the layout application market? Yes, whole-heartedly. Quark, Inc. only got as good as it did because it began as an upstart competitor to PageMaker. But I also believe in reaping what you sow. Quark, Inc. has stepped on its users and ignored them for so long because users had no other choice but QuarkXpress, that Quark, Inc. has become a real bad guy in the industry. I want to see Quark, Inc. finally realize the consequences of its actions, just like everyone else. It would be good for the market if Quark, Inc. did so, then learned from its mistakes and managed to stay alive to build a better application.
I don’t advocate the demise of Quark, Inc., I predict it. There’s a major difference there.





