Blogging Heads and Tails, Who Wags Whom?

The tail is begin­ning to wag the blog,” says Lev Grossman in his TIME Magazine arti­cle, Meet Joe Blog (Jun. 21, 2004). “Why are more and more peo­ple get­ting their news from ama­teur web­sites called blogs? Because they’re fast, fun­ny and total­ly biased.”

The arti­cle cov­ers every­thing from the Drudge Report to Slashdot to Baghdad blog­ger Salam Pax. Wonkette and Gawker are cov­ered exten­sive­ly, of course, because mass media can­not men­tion the word blog with­out Nick Denton.

This could be a prob­lem for the blo­gos­phere as a whole.

In tra­di­tion­al jour­nal­ism there is a long-held belief that behind every sto­ry, every even, every pop­u­lar move­ment, is a sin­gle per­son. Readers can’t iden­ti­fy with a con­cept with­out a human face, with­out a poster boy (or girl), jour­nal­ists believe. Denton has become the poster boy for blog­ging. It does­n’t mat­ter that Denton is a rel­a­tive­ly late arrival to the blo­gos­phere; when Big Media writes about Citizen Media (as I call blog­ging), Denton is the face plas­tered onto blog­ging, blogs, and Joe Blogger.

Why Denton? Easy: First, he’s doing well at the busi­ness of blog­ging (Good for you, Nick!). Second, he’s smart enough to find and exploit tal­ent like Anne Marie Cox of Wonkette. Last, and cer­tain­ly not least, he’s well con­nect­ed in Big Media–friends at the New York Times (and oth­er out­lets) make read­ing Gawker​.com and NYT side-by-side look like a quid pro quo blowjob broth­er­hood. One quotes the oth­er, then the first quotes the quoting.

I’m glad Denton is doing well–I real­ly am. Some of what he’s doing is good for the blo­gos­phere and the whole activ­i­ty of blog­ging. For one, he’s help­ing to raise the aware­ness of blog­ging and the col­lec­tive voice of Citizen Media. By embrac­ing Big Media’s predal­ic­tion to stick some­body’s face on every­thing, Denton is allow­ing Big Media to pro­mote the hell out of him, and there­by pro­mot­ing blogs as a news form. Thus Big Media gets to write sto­ries with­in its com­fort zone that give John Q. Public a headsup that blogs exist, that they are, at worst, a com­pan­ion to Big Media, and at best a replace­ment for many facets of Big Media, and, most impor­tant­ly, that blogs have a val­ue to John Q. Public. John is then going to read blogs, and, maybe, start one him­self, thus increas­ing the pow­er and influ­ence of Citizen Media.

Big Media, while afraid of Citizen Media’s poten­tial to carve large chunks out of painstak­ing­ly built media empires, is also help­ing to build the pub­lic voice of Citizen Media. It’s a pecu­liar dicote­my. Despite the threat blogs pose to Big Media’s prof­its and pow­er, Big Media can no longer ignore some­thing as news­wor­thy and influ­en­tial as the blo­gos­phere. Blogs are incit­ing polit­i­cal change. Blogs have pow­er. Blogs have the same kind of pow­er Big Media has, but with one all impor­tant excep­tion: Citizen Media isn’t con­trolled by those with mon­ey, influ­ence, and polit­i­cal con­nec­tions. Citizen Media isn’t mod­er­at­ed or cen­sored, and Citizen Journalists don’t work for any­one with the pow­er to kill a sto­ry or down­play an event. If, for one rea­son or anoth­er, one blog­ger is unable or unwill­ing to write about some­thing, the same sto­ry will be cov­ered by the next blog­ger. Big Media can be–and occas­sion­al­ly is–censored for polit­i­cal con­ve­nience or prof­it; Citizen Media, by its very def­i­n­i­tion, can nev­er be cen­sored. That makes Citizen Media annoy­ing to Big Media. When the pub­lic reads uncen­sored, unbi­ased Citizen Media and changes its opin­ion as a result, Citizen Media becomes dan­ger­ous to Big Media, the his­tor­i­cal and jeal­ous hold­er of pub­lic opinion-swaying power.

Electing Nick Denton as the poster boy for blog­ging could prove to be an Achilles heel for the blo­gos­phere and Citizen Media in gen­er­al. It has noth­ing to do with Denton him­self or his projects; Denton is as good a poster boy as any. Rather the dan­ger lies in the elec­tion of any indi­vid­ual to rep­re­sent such a large, diverse, and polit­i­cal­ly pow­er­ful group as blog­gers. Denton is human. Like the rest of us, Denton has human flaws and a his­to­ry. If some­thing scan­de­lous comes out about Denton–and blog­gers will make sure what­ev­er it is cre­ates head­lines around the blogosphere–it could tar­nish Citizen Media as a whole. If Big Media digs deep enough into Denton, some­thing scan­dalous, from his past or some­thing yet to occur, will sur­face. The same can be said of any of us. (I cer­tain­ly don’t want the world know­ing what hap­pened that October evening in the FSC Phi Mu soror­i­ty house… Nevermind.) Depending on what is dis­cov­ered about our poster boy, it can be spun in such a way as to injure blog­ging and Citizen Media.

What could do that? Well, it would­n’t be sex: Denton’s an Internet geek, so a sex scan­dal would like­ly only increase his ‘Net cred. I can see the Slashdot head­line now: “Internet Geek Gets Laid! IN THE FLESH! Other Net Geeks Assemble In IRC To Pray For Their Chance!”

So, if not sex, what could be so dev­as­tat­ing as to make John Q. Public dis­trust Citizen Media? How about bias­ing the unbi­asable? The pub­lic dis­trusts Big Media right now because Big Media has proven itself to be any­thing but the impar­tial observ­er. Can you trust CNN to fair­ly report on its own­er, AOL Time-Warner? Of course not. The same can be said of any Big Media out­let. Even Big Media itself con­cedes that Citizen Media may be the only way to get fair, unadul­ter­at­ed news.

John Q. Public is build­ing up trust in Citizen Media. He trusts that we don’t cen­sor our­selves, that we don’t pan­der to cor­po­rate spon­sors or polit­i­cal agen­das, and that we will give him the straight dope, as we see it. What we report is biased and opin­ion­at­ed, yes, but so many of us do it that a bal­ance is struck. I like this, you hate it. Between us we’ll tell John Q. Public every­thing he needs to make up his own mind.

But, if an accu­sa­tion of cor­po­rate or polit­i­cal influ­ence is levied, it would shake John’s faith in Citizen Media. Imagine this sce­nario: Denton (or whomev­er) meets some­one at a par­ty who says she can give him an exclu­sive to a juicy news sto­ry. A week lat­er this woman calls Denton and tips him off to chem­i­cal waste dump­ing in Nebraska. Running with the exclu­sive, Denton’s blog­gers rush it to post, beat­ing Big Media. Then more infor­ma­tion about the waste dump­ing is fed to the blog­gers: There are X num­ber of leukemia cas­es being report­ed around the dump­ing zone; County Commissioner Smith was paid off to ignore the dump­ing; County Commissioner Smith claims that the Governor made the deal ten years ago; no, not the cur­rent Governor, the Governor ten years pri­or, the cur­rent U.S. Senator Jones… The events of the sto­ry unfold in blogs and in Big Media, build­ing pub­lic trust and reliance on at least the blogs that broke the sto­ry and car­ried the major points of the issue. Congressional hear­ings occur. At the next elec­tion, Senator Jones is oust­ed by an over­whelm­ing majority.

Since break­ing the orig­i­nal sto­ry, Gawker, Wonkette, et al have been cap­i­tal­iz­ing on their increased traf­fic. Advertisers are lin­ing up for runs. One such run, a par­tic­u­lar­ly large and prof­itable one, is from a food dis­tri­b­u­tion com­pa­ny which hap­pens to be a sub­sidiary of phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal giant GlaxoSmithKline. The Washington Post digs up evi­dence that Denton’s con­tact was a lob­by­ist for the phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal indus­try. The new Senator, replac­ing dis­graced Senator Jones, is much more sym­pa­thet­ic to the inter­ests of the phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal lob­by than was Jones.

You can see the poten­tial dam­age to Citizen Media’s cred­i­bil­i­ty. Find a sec­ond instance of blogs pandering–intentionally or unin­ten­tion­al­ly, with or with­out the blogger’s knowledge–to pri­vate inter­est, and John Q. Public will think twice before believ­ing any­thing Citizen Media says. If the first or even sec­ond to fall is the blogosphere’s poster boy, whether Denton or some­one who suc­ceeds him for the role, the event will severe­ly dimin­ish the public’s faith in Citizen Media.

While it does ben­e­fit the blo­gos­phere to have a fig­ure head, that individual’s cred­i­bil­i­ty becomes equiv­a­lent to the blogosphere’s as a whole. Figure heads are human, with human fail­ings. The high­er they climb (or are ele­vat­ed, depend­ing on your point of view), the more inter­est­ed Big Media becomes in knock­ing them down. If Denton is Citizen Media’s fig­ure head, and Denton is already get­ting into bed with cor­po­rate blog­ging, maybe we should think about ways to step out from under the avalanche if he gets knocked down.