For a moment, I am going to dip into web design to illustrate why Deep Green Crystals is an example of extraordinarily bad blog design. More accurately, I am not dipping into web design; I am illuminating basic facts about readability, for the web or anywhere.
In doing some research about tags and services like Technorati and Del.icio.us that index blog content via tags, I ran across Deep Green Crystals, Martin Tobias Musings.
I will reiterate: Deep Green Crystals is an example of very bad blog design.
Why is it so bad? Visit it (or view the screenshot). Roughly half of you will have to scroll horizontally to read each line. All of you will be forced to scan your eyes horizontally far beyond their comfort levels.
Human eyes have an average limit of lateral gaze around 160 degrees. As gaze does not include peripheral vision, which is not directly involved in reading, that means our eyes can track a maximum of 160 degrees horizontally before rotation of the head is necessary. Regardless of the maximum range of lateral gaze, our comfort level rests around 35 degrees; if we have to move our eyes from side-to-side more than 35 degrees, the effort begins to strain the muscles of the eye–both muscles involved in movement and in focusing.
I’ll spare you the anatomy and logistics lessons and jump from A‑Z without boring you with the points between.
Given the average human’s lateral gaze range and the distance from eye to subject of interest (in this case, the computer screen), Deep Green Crystals is not a comfortable read. At a typical distance from eye to subject of interest of 12–18″, Deep Green Crystals’ 900px wide content column forces the eye to scan over 90 degrees–far beyond the comfort level for most people’s eyes.
At the risk of stating the obvious, when reading forces the eye to move beyond its comfort range, eye strain develops. The longer one reads outside the comfortable range, the more strain that develops, with symptoms including soreness of the occular muscles (both motion and focus), sluggish focus response on objects of varying distance, dryness of the eyes, headaches, and a general eye soreness.
Bluntly, Deep Green Crystals is too wide for comfort.
Look at a newspaper or magazine. That isn’t rhetorical, please go grab a newspaper or magazine. Notice the layout is set in multiple columns? Columns are not a device to present more information on a page. Quite the opposite, actually; the habit of periodicals (newspapers especially) to present multiple articles on a single page came about as a beneficial consequence of the need for narrow columns of text.
Periodicals are designed to be read. That is their entire reason for being (bird cage lining is a byproduct). They set their content in narrow columns because, hundreds of years ago, content providers learned that humans can only comfortably read for any length of time narrow width lines.
Blogs are made to be read as well (usually). So why would a blog like Deep Green Crystals design its site to be uncomfortable to read?
Whether it be in print or online, columns of text should be limited to no more than 8–10 words wide; “words,” for measurement purposes, are five letters. Thus your text should never be written with more than 40–50 characters in a horizontal line.
If your text is set at 10pt–which, on screen, equals roughly 10 pixels–then your columns should never exceed 500 pixels wide. In reality, you want a narrower column to account for the fact that most fonts are variable width (e.g. an I takes up less horizontal space than an M). A good rule of thumb is to make your column no more than the maximum comfortable width less 10%. So, for 10pt type the maximum column width should be 450 pixels (10px type X 50 characters per line = 500px; 500px – 10% = 450px).
Narrower is fine–within reason. This website uses 10pt type inside a main content column width of 350px, enabling comfortable reading for extended periods of time. QuarkVSInDesign.com is also set on a main content column width of 350px but uses 9pt type. The Design Weblog uses 430px, but the type is slightly larger than either of the previous examples, thus working out to roughly the same average words per line.
Rules of thumb aside, you want columns that are 8–10 words wide–however the ratio of font size to column width works out.
If your blog resembles Deep Green Crystals, change it. Be kind to your readers’ eyes. Your readers will reward you by spending more time on your site (higher pages-per-visit), a greater willingness to comment, and by referring others.
I agree about the column width issue – it has a scientific basis and it’s not a rule that should be broken, unless someone wants to send their readers away.
So of course that made me think about the format of the text I was reading…
Now, what about the justification issue? It does make things easier to read if your eye knows exactly how far it has to go each line, but the negatives of the ‘rivers’ that develop outweigh the benefits when the line length gets too short.
I noticed that this column has quite wide spaces between the words due to the justification – I wonder whether it would work better left justified, or with different font formatting?
Btw, this comment box is right justified, it’s an interesting feeling to see the type move to the left as I write!
Hi, Katharine.
Probably.
The word space does vary quite a bit with browsers’ barely passable text composition engine. Web design would be so much more readable if browsers had support for hyphenation and a composition engine that actually makes alignment and spacing decisions based upon more than just whether the last word in the line will fit without wrapping.
But, your question is not about the limitations of browsers; it was about my design decisions here.
Left aligned instead of full justification would even the word spacing indeed. But, it changes the flow of the eye and gestalt of the design. I made a conscious decision to sacrifice a little on readability for the benefit of the overall layout.
Isn’t it? Just a little bit of fun.
Web pages are a long way away from print when it comes to text, aren’t they! But considering how much harder work it is to read on the screen than the printed page, it’s an issue long overdue for some changes.
I really like your blog, that’s all I’ve got to say. NICE DESIGN, I THINK…
I’m from Croatia. I accidentaly saw your web-adress.