Quark Releases Free Book on Using QuarkXPress 7 with Adobe Creative Suite 3

PRESS RELEASE

14 December 2007 – Quark Inc. announced today that it has cre­at­ed a book out­lin­ing how QuarkXPress® 7 can be inte­grat­ed with Adobe® Creative Suite® 3 to gain max­i­mum ben­e­fit from both design tools. Written by Quark® inter­nal experts, the book details how users can work with QuarkXPress 7 as well as Adobe appli­ca­tions such as Illustrator®, Photoshop®, Dreamweaver® and Flash® to unlock the full poten­tial of all their design software.

QuarkXPress 7 now has bet­ter inte­gra­tion with Photoshop and Illustrator tools than ever before. Through stan­dards like SWF, XHTML and CSS, QuarkXPress users can pub­lish across media both inde­pen­dent­ly and along­side Adobe Creative Suite appli­ca­tions, like Adobe Flash and Adobe Dreamweaver. The book out­lines in more detail how QuarkXPress works with Creative Suite and the best prac­tices that users should take when using these applications.

QuarkXPress and Photoshop are the two most wide­ly used design appli­ca­tions and QuarkXPress is con­sid­ered by many to have the best inte­gra­tion with Photoshop’s PSD file for­mat of any lay­out tool avail­able today. The book rec­om­mends when users should use the PSD file for­mat for images and gives tips on how to get the best results.

Illustrator is anoth­er exten­sive­ly used appli­ca­tion and is used to cre­ate logos and vec­tor illus­tra­tions. Traditionally, the route into QuarkXPress has been to export an EPS from Illustrator, how­ev­er it is now pos­si­ble to import native Illustrator editable PDF files into QuarkXPress. This gives much more flex­i­bil­i­ty and also the advan­tage of hav­ing an Illustrator file that can be eas­i­ly shared across the organisation.

The intro­duc­tion of Quark Interactive Designer has made it is eas­i­er than ever to out­put SWF (Flash®) files direct­ly from QuarkXPress 7. Users can eas­i­ly cre­ate inter­ac­tive mate­ri­als by lever­ag­ing the design pre­ci­sion and ease-of-use of QuarkXPress with the pow­er and flex­i­bil­i­ty of the Flash for­mat. This means that users can cre­ate for print, pre­sen­ta­tions and online mul­ti­me­dia with­out hav­ing to learn mul­ti­ple applications.

QuarkXPress now has bet­ter inte­gra­tion with Adobe Creative Suite than ever before and this free book high­lights how users can lever­age all appli­ca­tions to improve their design expe­ri­ence. QuarkXPress 7 now gives the user more cre­ative lat­i­tude with­in one sin­gle appli­ca­tion,” said Marc Horne a Quark expert and con­trib­u­tor. “We also looked at the ben­e­fits of some of QuarkXPress 7’s exclu­sive fea­tures includ­ing Quark Composition Zones®, Job Jackets® and Flash (SWF) Output and made some direct com­par­isons with Adobe InDesign.” 

The book con­cludes with a fea­ture com­par­i­son table that eval­u­ates QuarkXPress and InDesign CS 3 in terms of how well each inte­grates with the oth­er Creative Suite appli­ca­tions. It finds that QuarkXPress 7 not only inte­grates equal­ly as well with the Adobe Creative Suite but also offers a host of exclu­sive features.

The free book is avail­able to down­loaded at http://​www​.quark​.com/​p​r​o​d​u​c​t​s​/​x​p​r​e​s​s​/​d​o​c​u​m​e​n​t​a​t​i​o​n.html. Click on “QuarkXPress 7 Integration with Creative Suite 3.”

About Quark
Quark Inc. (www​.quark​.com) is an inno­v­a­tive soft­ware com­pa­ny pro­vid­ing design, pro­duc­tion, and col­lab­o­ra­tion solu­tions that are trans­form­ing the busi­ness of cre­ative com­mu­ni­ca­tions. Quark has pro­vid­ed award-winning soft­ware for pro­fes­sion­al pub­lish­ers since its flag­ship prod­uct, QuarkXPress, changed the course of tra­di­tion­al pub­lish­ing. Denver-based Quark Inc. is pri­vate­ly held.

5 thoughts on “Quark Releases Free Book on Using QuarkXPress 7 with Adobe Creative Suite 3

  1. Ad agency owner

    QuarkXPress is con­sid­ered by many to have the best inte­gra­tion with Photoshop’s PSD file for­mat of any lay­out tool avail­able today. ”

    By, “many?”

    How many is “many?”

    What about by MOST?

    The book con­cludes with a fea­ture com­par­i­son table that eval­u­ates QuarkXPress and InDesign CS 3 in terms of how well each inte­grates with the oth­er Creative Suite applications.”

    They’re still quite des­per­ate over there at Quark, aren’t they? This reminds me of their ridicu­lous post­card campaign.

  2. Mjenius

    So basi­cal­ly they are say­ing that the Quark advan­tages are so great that some­one who has Adobe Creative Suite 3 (which includes InDesign) should go out and buy QuarkXpress 7. Somehow I feel that this is more about get­ting old­er QuarkXpress users to upgrade and keep them from try­ing out InDesign.

  3. Designer

    PSD sup­port is fact, QuarkXPress does have bet­ter sup­port for the file for­mat and manip­u­la­tion of the for­mat with­in the lay­out application.

    By many they obvi­ous­ly mean peo­ple that use or try the appli­ca­tion, because it’s fact. How is ID in any­way bet­ter at PSD sup­port and interactivity?

  4. Mjenius

    You’re right, Quark has bet­ter PSD sup­port. But for peo­ple like me, it’s not a game chang­ing advan­tage that will dri­ve me to plunk down the extra cash to buy QuarkXpress. I sim­ply do my changes to PSD files from Photoshop any­ways, even bet­ter if you’re uti­liz­ing bridge. Since I do all my work in comp res­o­lu­tion first any­ways. But I could see it being a help­ful fea­ture in desk­top pub­lish­ing or depend­ing how you like to work. Interactivity? I don’t know, to me it nev­er real­ly made sense to cre­ate that kind of stuff on a “desk­top lay­out pro­gram”, it almost feels like using a wrench to “ham­mer” a nail. I just use DW or Flash. I know that Quark is mov­ing in a direc­tion where they want to be more than a desk­top pub­lish­ing pro­gram. That’s fine, but I was nev­er a fan of those “all-in-one” gad­gets. They usu­al­ly don’t do any one thing very well. But there are those few that do suc­ceed so I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.

  5. T. Herman Zweibel

    Does this sto­ry sound like it was pla­gia­rized from The ONION?

Comments are closed.