Mum’s the word in Denver about what is described in a 4 October press release as “an innovative new product from Quark.” What is this new product? Quark declined to return my calls asking for comment.
The new product could be almost anything. A number of high profile publishers have recently announced their adoption of Quark’s publishing workflow management systems, Quark Publishing System (QPS) and Quark Dynamic Document Server (QuarkDDS). We could be looking at an add-on for QPS or QuarkDDS, maybe one that extends their programming support and versatility into the range of SOAP-driven InDesign Server.
MacExpo London could bring a Photoshop competitor, too. QuarkXPress has been losing ground to InDesign partly because of the tight integration of that application with Adobe’s defacto standard image editor and the bundling of InDesign and Photoshop into Adobe’s Creative Suite. A viable Photoshop competitor could boost XPress sales.
Last year Quark acquired A Lowly Apprentice Productions, a plug-in maker known for its expertise with Photoshop (ALAP’s technology became the PSD import and manipulation tools in QuarkXPress 7). Quark has also been extremely cozy with Apple since 2002, even borrowing some of Apple’s programmers for development of XPress 6.x and 7. Independent of Quark, Apple has been chipping away at the base of the monolithic Photoshop by bundling Photoshop-like and Photoshop-exact features into the OS X operating system and Apple’s own applications. Other Apple developments are erecting tents just beyond Adobe’s other borders, hinting that a concerted siege may be forthcoming.
Allying with Quark to topple Adobe’s singular hold on the professional image editing and photo-retouching markets would be a giant check in the win column for both Apple and Quark.
Could the mystery application be a consumer-level QuarkXPress-lite to compete with a rumored in-the-works InDesign Elements? Not likely. Quark’s just isn’t interested in serving consumer and prosumer markets, and those markets just aren’t as important to Quark’s continued survival as top-end publishing and high-volume production. (For the record, I don’t believe the rumors that Adobe is working on InDesign Elements, either–at least, not such a product to be released any time soon.)
So, what could Quark’s new product be? It could be a lot of things, but I have a theory.
I think it’s a multi-media publishing tool. Imagine QuarkXPress meets Dreamweaver, with (almost) one-button simultaneous output to HTML, XML, Flash, HTMLHelp, Windows Help format, and PDF. Consider a QuarkXPress-esque WYSIWYG Web and electronic document editor without all the silly little icons and dotted lines that mar Dreamweaver–an editing environment with the simplicity and cleanliness of QuarkXPress and a for-print QuarkXPress document. Now add in an HTML/XML source editor. Lastly, imagine if this new hybrid could also create PDF electronic forms with tools and a user environment more familiar and intuitive to creative and production pros than the Microsoft Access-inspired Adobe LiveCycle Designer.
On what do I base this wild theory? Quark’s own words of course.
In November 2005 Quark commissioned a survey from Absolut Data Research & Analytics. At the time, Quark VS InDesign.com reported on the survey because it contained explicit details about the features and functionality of the then as-yet (and still) unannounced InDesign CS3 and all of Creative Suite 3. Also in that survey were several questions hinting at a possible QuarkXPress-inspired Web design tool. The survey even put forth a feature list and proposed price–US$299–for the hypothetical application.
In a similar online survey last month from Absolut Data Research & Analytics, the same Web authoring application was discussed again, in greater detail.
My theory is further bolstered by confidential sources inside Quark who told Quark VS InDesign.com that developer groups in Quark’s India and Switzerland offices have been spending a lot of time learning about HTML, CSS, and XML/XHTML.
While the market is holding its breath for Creative Suite 3, when Adobe is expected to make good use of its acquired Macromedia technology to deliver a true multimedia publishing platform with InDesign and InCopy at its core, such a publishing system from Quark, six months ahead of Adobe’s expected April 2007 CS3 release date, could steal some of the wind from Adobe’s sails.
Is any of this relevant? Is my theory of a Quark Web layout application or xtensions add-on suite for XPress correct? Or, will we see Quark PhotoXPress, QuarkXPress Server, or something else entirely?
We’ll know in two weeks.
Quark Senior Vice President of Desktop Products, Jurgen Kurz, will deliver a keynote presentation 26 October, 2006 at MacExpo London. Kurz will discuss the latest developments at Quark, preview several products planned for future release, and, of course, launch the next new Quark product.
Registration for the keynote presentation is separate from registration to the MacExpo exhibition. Quark notes that all keynote attendees will be given complimentary access to MacExpo following Kurz’s keynote. First come, first served registration is available at Quark’s European Website.
All the speculated products mentioned above sound great, and I truly hope that it is a PS competitor or HTML/XML editor… but, realistically I think that its the newest version of CopyDesk which would be compatible with QXP 7… Thats just my opinion.
Let me guess… Quark buys Freeway?
While a new version of CopyDesk would certainly be in Quark’s better interests, the language chosen to hype the 26 October announcement strongly suggests a brand new product.
I hold firm to my belief that it will be a multi-media application capable of publishing X/HTML and Flash with familiar XPress-like tools and user interface. Further, if this new mystery product doesn’t do PDF forms yet, I expect one of the other “upcoming products” will.
Anyone interested in a friendly, non-monetary wager about it? ;-)
Quark today released QuarkXPress Server 7–a SOAP-driven server as I predicted above.
This isn’t the mystery application to be announced on the 26th, however. This is another new product release.
Quark’s burning up the newswires this month.
OK OK, so it’s a PS competitor or a web editor. Either way they’ll be doing what they’ve been doing for almost the last decade.…. playing catch-up.
I dont think anyone should put their money against Pariah’s becuase he will win the bet :)…
Maybe so, but at this stage in the game they’re the trailblazers of the industry. Whatever they do now is still at least 6 months ahead of what the main competition will put out. IMO they’re definitely taking the right steps. They’re not sitting on their asses hoping for the best. They’re actually putting some effort in to reclaiming some of their lost marketshare and possibly inducing new users to their product(s). Truthfully, I’m glad that someone is putting up a fight against Adobe. Especially since they’re the ones resisting the jump to the intel based machines. I’m not sure what kind of tif Adobe and Apple have got with each other but it ultimately affects us, the end user. So, hats off to Quark for moving forward.
PS. These wars usually lead to innovative new products. It’s nice to be able to pick and choose the tools you use in your toolbox. One way or another, it should be interesting.
You’re absolutely right, Quark would not be in this situation if they’ve always been this motivated to improve. And obviously they are very motivated right now. It didn’t really hit me, but yeah, we are the ultimate winners. I mean, right now I can purchase the whole Creative Suite and Quark, for the same amount I used to spend just on Quark alone. I doubt that Quark will overtake Adobe, but then they don’t need to. If they can provide the necessary solutions to stop more Quark users from jumping ship, they’ll be fine. They have to stop the bleeding first, then reasses their strategy. I don’t think at this point they should worry about winning back those they’ve lost already, but rather take care of their current users. I mean take real good care of them. Hopefully they learned their lesson, and who knows maybe someday Adobe will get too comfortable and make the same mistakes.
No kidding! The price of software has gone down significantly (thank goodness) which helps quite a bit. I actually got the QXP 7 upgrade for $79 I couldn’t believe it! Anyhow, hopefully this next wave of products will follow suit in terms of pricing.
… and now for that mystery product.
Server 7 was just an update to DDS3.5.2, already soap complient, QuarkXPress ServerDDS was around years before InDesign Server and is a far more capable product, this has been the case with DDs and Server. InDesign is just a bad copy using bad concepts