A special six-part series introduces InCopy CS2, reviews the features and limitations to the InDesign/InCopy workflow, and explains why design and editorial both need to use InCopy CS2--beginning yesterday.
The InDesign/InCopy workflow is an extremely simple, powerful, and, in collaborative creative-editorial environments like periodicals and books, important leap forward with massive bottom-line ramifications.
Every InDesign user knows that InDesign by itself boosts creative freedom, streamlines production methodologies, and increases efficiency and productivity, but it brings little to the dynamic of design and non-design collaboration. This one-sided advantage is a barrier to widespread InDesign adoption in high-volume periodicals and other workflows in which creatives and non-creatives work simultaneously on projects. Adding InCopy to the workflow unlocks the true productive potential in environments where editorial and creative collaborate to build a single publication. Yet in any InDesign 2, CS, or even CS2 books, InCopy rarely rates more than a brief mention in a resources appendix.
Few professional trainers and consultants have ever seen InCopy, let alone employed it to produce mission-critical publications in a professional collaborative environment and can offer experienced, workflow-specific instruction in it. We found less than a handful, and I am one of them.
Even most articles and Websites that mention InCopy contain little more than pointers back to the basic resources on Adobe.com. InCopy has never been given the attention it deserves. After having used InCopy CS2 in our own projects and having replaced clients’ slow, redundancy-plagued workflows with efficient, intuitive InDesign-InCopy systems, we here at Quark VS InDesign.com feel like walking door-to-door among the publishing and advertising world, handing out free copies of this amazing application. Obviously can’t do that, so we’re going to do what we can do: We’re going to not only tell you about InCopy CS2, its function and features, we’re going to show you how to use it—first from the perspective of a designer making assignments and using assigned content in InDesign, then from the perspective of a writer or editor, opening InCopy and working with assigned content.
So, exactly what is InCopy CS2? What makes it a threat to Word’s stranglehold on professional editorial and copywriting? How did one major book publisher shave a full 10 weeks off the production of a title? And, most importantly, how can you use InCopy today?
Part 1 In a six-part series of special reports beginning with “InCopy CS2, the World; World, InCopy CS2†on Friday, 14 October 2005, Quark VS InDesign.com will go in deep for a long overdue examination of InCopy, the features new to version CS2, how InCopy cut one major publisher’s 60-day book production schedule down to 9 days, and how it will save you time, man-power, and money over Microsoft Word in a collaborative creative and editorial workflow.
Part 2 In part two, “A Newsletter Designer Looks At InCopy CS2,†Samuel John Klein provides a personal account of integrating InCopy CS2 into the real-world production of the Columbia Overlook, the newsletter of the Sierra Club, Oregon Chapter, Columbia Group.
Part 3 Part three is a case study of the migration of the proposal generation process of a real-world land developer from four separate departments working linearly and redundantly in InDesign and disparate applications, to a parallel InDesign-InCopy workflow. “Proposing Efficiency with InCopy CS2†details the experience of Omega Industrial Environs, a fictional company based upon an actual multi-national land development firm, as they leap their multiple department workflow to InCopy CS2. The Acme Industrial Environs workflow includes designers laying out graphically rich 250–600 page proposal books, brochures, and DVD-hosted web content that include editorial content from a team of proposal writers; financial charts, graphs, and tables from the accounting team, and; floorplans, maps, and schematics from the engineering and architecture teams. With copy, financial data, and even technical drawings changing throughout the proposal process up to the very last moment, the exiting Omega Industrial Environs workflow put tremendous strain on the layout department to constantly update and revise large portions of the proposal books. By migrating from Word to InCopy and writing a few custom scripts, Omega Industrial Environs removed the burden of updating other departments’ content from the shoulders of the creative team, speeding the proposal generation process and leaving the creatives to focus on what they do best.
Part 4 “How-To: InDesign/InCopy Collaboration: the Designer,†part four of the series, is a hands-on tutorial from the perspective of the creative. It will explain step-by-step how the creative team initiates, controls, and concludes a typical InDesign/InCopy workflow.
Part 5 Next, in part five, “How-To: InDesign/InCopy Collaboration: the Editor,†is a hands-on tutorial written for and from the perspective of the editor or writer. It explains step-by-step how to use InCopy without having to become a layout artist.
Part 6 Capping off our special series is “InCopy CS2: Bigger than the Box.†Although InCopy is available as a standalone application for small creative and editorial teams, it was initially conceived—and continues to thrive—as the foundation for robust third-party editorial platforms. We’ll talk with some of the companies integrating custom InCopy- and InDesign-based systems into large workflows, as well as examine the specific needs satisfied by those publishing platforms.
If you think InDesign alone is a great innovation in print publishing, wait until you see what it can do with a little help from its friends. The most indepth coverage of InCopy CS2 available anywhere begins Friday–only on Quark VS InDesign.com,
Well you’ve sure got me exited! And I don’t even work at a book publisher ;-)
I am curently lerning Indesign cs2 and i think it is an extremely smart program, and i need to do a lot of things in Indesign, so if i could see how Incopy could complement Indesign, I look forward to seeing your articles.
I have found this site through a search on Google, and since than i visit your site every day :) thak u for informing me on what to chose, between quark and indesign and all of the other great articles.
This is a good idea for a series. We run QPS and I have been looking closely at InDesign/InCopy based systems. Part 6 will be of particular important to many people. While CS2 provides important integration tools missing from the earlier versions, nothing replaces real workflow software, and what is available for InDesign varies from the simple andinexpensive to expensive and complex. In all fairness, InCopy should be compared to QuarkCopyDesk because InCopy is missing some important features that QuarkCopyDesk has (and InCopy can do tricks that QuarkCopyDesk lacks).
This is what keeps me coming back. Thanks!
What happened to parts 5 & 6?